Tuesday, July 8, 2008

A Brief History of the 'Health Exception'

Some valuable background on the health exception from Vicki Saporta.

While the majority of women choose abortion care early in their pregnancies (89% of all abortions in the United States are obtained within the first 12 weeks - PDF), there are cases where a woman may need to obtain a later abortion in order to protect her life or preserve her health, including her mental health. Contrary to the speculation of some abortion opponents, a woman does not obtain a later abortion simply because she's "having a bad day." These cases often involve severe fetal anomalies that can cause great emotional distress and be devastating to a woman's psychological health. ...

A Brief History of the 'Health Exception' | Reproductive Health | RHRealityCheck.org

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Inconsistancy in the “life begins at conception” argument

Over at Human Enhancement and Biopolitics they try to introduce the anti-choice crowd to reality.

The view that human life begins at conception is a favoured view of most of the pro-life camp. By it, they do not mean that the sperm and ova were not alive and only became so at conception, but rather that ‘human life’ - in the special sense of a person who deserves protection under the law - begins at conception. Unfortunately for them, this view is logically inconsistent with that pesky thing called reality.

Inconsistancy in the “life begins at conception” argument « Human Enhancement and Biopolitics

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Cashiers for Life

Cristina Page takes on William Saletan, who seems to think it's no big deal to jump back in your Escalade and find another drugstore when the first refuses to sell you contraceptives.

William Saletan, the Slate columnist who's made a career of claiming to be pro-choice while justifying attacks on reproductive rights, has had yet another epiphany: We should all support the rights of pharmacists to refuse to fill our doctor's prescriptions for birth control.

Cashiers for Life | Reproductive Health | RHRealityCheck.org

Monday, June 23, 2008

George Carlin: Pro-Life is Anti-Woman

George Carlin is gone but not forgotten.

Saturday, June 21, 2008

Anti-Choice Pharmacies Help to Increase the Abortion Rate

When ideology enters the pharmacy.... More at Feministe.

You can guess what “pro-life” pharmacies do: They don’t fill scripts for birth control or emergency contraception, which means that they make it harder for women to prevent unwanted pregnancies. And when you don’t have the tools to prevent pregnancy, guess what happens? You get pregnant! Since about half of unintended pregnancies end in abortion, you can thank your friendly “pro-life” pharmacist for doing his part in jacking up the abortion rate.

Feministe » Anti-Choice Pharmacies Help to Increase the Abortion Rate

Friday, June 20, 2008

The Voice of Moderation?

Cristina Page on John McCain:

He's an unapologetic proponent of the failed abstinence-only approach as well. He voted against making "abstinence-only" programs medically accurate (the most authoritative study found that more than 80% of abstinence-only curricula, used by more than 2/3 of federal recipients, contains false, misleading, or distorted information.) He also wanted to take $75 million from the Maternal and Child Health Block Grant to launch an abstinence‐until-marriage program that prohibits sexually active teens from learning about birth control. Yet another time he tried to route one‐third of all HIV/AIDS prevention funds to the completely ineffective "just say no to sex" programs.

Cristina Page: The McModerate - Politics on The Huffington Post

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

McCain And Abortion

Kevin Drum files this report on CBS News.

John McCain's reputation for cross-party moderation has been so ingrained for so long that a lot of people simply assume he holds positions he doesn't. In particular, an awful lot of centrist voters assume that McCain has fairly centrist views on abortion. So what happens when they find out that, in fact, McCain's actual position is pretty much identical to James Dobson's? A new Greenberg Quinlan Rosner poll of battleground states provides a clue:

Once balanced information about Obama and McCain's respective positions on choice is introduced, Obama gains 6 points overall, with his lead in battleground states expanding from a net 2 points (47-45 percent) to a net 13 points (53-40 percent).

....Despite the fact that the national focus seems to be on the economy, among pro-choice Independent women, pro-choice Republican women, and liberal to moderate Republican women, the issue of abortion produces a larger advantage for Democrats than the economy, the war in Iraq, or health care. Moreover, among these three groups critiques on McCain's anti-choice position are the strongest attacks against him, trumping attacks on the economy, the war, and special interests.
This kind of stuff is more than normally tricky, since you can almost always get a fair number of people to change their view by reading some carefully chosen critiques of whatever issue you're polling about. Still, in this case GQR's statement was fairly straightforward: Obama believes abortion is a personal decision and supports Roe v. Wade, while McCain is pro-life and wants to overturn Roe v. Wade. All by itself, that produced a 6-point swing.

Abortion is unlikely to be a major issue in this year's election, but it's not a big effort to simply make sure that voters know McCain's actual position: He thinks abortion should be illegal, and if he becomes president he'll do his best to appoint Supreme Court justices who think so too.

McCain And Abortion, By Kevin Drum - CBS News